Diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies in upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Sweden between 2015 and 2021: a population-based survey.

OBJECTIVE: To report national data on diagnostics and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from the Swedish National Registry of Urinary Bladder Cancer (SNRUBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 2015 to 2021 were retrieved, and descriptive analyses were performed regarding incidence, diagnostic modalities, preoperative tumor staging, quality indicators for treatment including the use of standardized care pathways (SCP) and multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Time trends were explored for the study period. RESULTS: Registrations included 1,213 patients with renal pelvic cancer and 911 patients with ureteric cancer with a median age of 74 (interquartile range [IQR] 70-77) and 75 (IQR 71-78) years, respectively. Incidence rates of UTUC were stable, as were proportions of curative treatment intent. Median number of days from referral to treatment was 76 (IQR 57-99) and 90 (IQR 72-118) days, respectively, for tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter, which remained unchanged after introduction of SCP in 2016. Noticeable trends included stable use of kidney-sparing surgery and increased use of MDTB. For radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), robot-assisted technique usage increased even for non-organ-confined tumors (cT3-4) and in one out of three patients undergoing RNU a bladder cuff excision was not registered. CONCLUSIONS: The population-based SNRUBC with high coverage contributes to the knowledge about UTUC with granular and generalizable data. The present study reveals a high proportion of patients not subjected to curatively intended treatment and suggests unmet needs to shorten lead times to treatment and use of bladder cuff excision when performing radical surgery for UTUC in Sweden.

Diagnosis and Management of Non-Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: AUA/SUO Guideline.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based diagnoses and management of non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center of Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) team conducted searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to March 3rd, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through January 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through January 2022). The searches were updated August 2022. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (Table 1).[Table: see text]Results:This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of non-metastatic UTUC including risk stratification, surveillance and survivorship. Treatments discussed include kidney sparing management, surgical management, lymph node dissection (LND), neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: This standardized guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with UTUC based on available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support these statements for improving patient care. Updates will occur as the knowledge regarding disease biology, clinical behavior and new therapeutic options develop.

Chondrosarcoma of Ureter in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.

Chondrosarcoma is a rare type of cancer that can affect the upper urinary tract. Because of its rarity, the clinical presentation of chondrosarcoma can be similar to other urinary tract conditions, such as renal colic, hematuria, and urothelial carcinoma. The primary treatment for chondrosarcoma is the surgical removal of the tumor, and radiation or chemotherapy may be used for advanced cases. However, because of the limited number of patients with this condition, there are no established guidelines for chemotherapy, and the outcomes are unclear. In this case, we present a 71-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with ureteral chondrosarcoma. She presented with abdominal pain and hydronephrosis, and a tumor was found beneath a small stone. The patient underwent nephroureterectomy and received oral fluorouracil chemotherapy due to the advanced stage of the disease. Fortunately, the patient survived, and at the 7 months post-operative follow-up there was no evidence of recurrence. In conclusion, the chondrosarcoma of the upper urinary tract is a rare condition that can be difficult to diagnose due to its similarity to other urinary tract conditions. Treatment typically involves the surgical removal of the tumor, with radiation or chemotherapy reserved for advanced cases. However, because of the limited number of patients, there are no established guidelines for chemotherapy, and the outcomes of treatment are unclear.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update.

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS: A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS: The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.

Adherence to guideline recommendations in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an analysis of the CROES-UTUC registry.

BACKGROUND: The European Association of Urology provides Clinical Practice Guideline on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to the rarity of UTUC, guidelines are necessary to help guide decision-making based on the highest quality of care evidence available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate guideline adherence in the management of UTUC by assessing recommendations on diagnostics needed for risk classification and subsequent treatment selection; to assess predictors for the latter. PARTICIPANTS: Data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endo Urology Society UTUC-registry were included for analysis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Overall compliance were evaluated by cross-tables, differences in risk groups characteristics and treatment selection were assessed by Chi-square tests, predictors for treatment selection by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Data from 2380 patients were included. Imaging by CT-scan had highest adherence (85%) but was low for other diagnostics (17.7-49.7%). Multivariable regression analysis showed higher odds of receiving radical nephroureterectomy in patients with large tumours (OR 5.45, 95% CI 3.77-7.87, p < 0.001), signs of invasion (OR 3.07,CI 2.11-4.46, p < 0.001), high tumour grade (OR 2.05, CI 1.38-3.05, p < 0.001) and multifocality (OR 1.76,CI 1.05-2.97, p =0.032). CONCLUSIONS: CT-imaging is the most used and most impactful decision tool for risk-stratification and treatment selection in UTUC. Due to the low compliance in most of the diagnostic recommendations, proper risk stratification is not possible in a significant group of patients raising the question whether current stratification is deemed applicable in daily practice. Established prognostic factors on survival guides decision-making regarding radical versus kidney-sparing surgery. Tumour size was the most influencing factor on treatment decision. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188 ).

First Report of Oncological Outcome and Prognostic Analysis in a First-Line Setting of Short Hydration Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a modified-short hydration gemcitabine and cisplatin (m-shGC) regimen for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to assess the efficacy of a geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) with regard to prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to July 2020, 68 patients with mUC underwent first-line m-shGC therapy with 70 mg/m2 cisplatin and 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine (days 1, 8, and 15), with 2,050 mL fluid replaced on the first day of each 28-day cycle. Prior to the start of treatment, the serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and levels of albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) in serum, as well as body heights and weights were measured. Patients were grouped according to GNRI <92 (low) or ≥92 (high). The analysis of data was done retrospectively. RESULTS: Median follow-up was found to be 12.9 (range 1.7-50.2) months and the objective response rate (ORR) was 54.4% after m-shGC treatment. The ORR was significantly different when high and low-GNRI groups were compared (ORR: 28.0 vs. 69.8% in low- vs. high-GNRI groups). Median overall survival (OS) was calculated as 8.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-21.3) and 34.5 (95% CI: 20.5-NA) months for low- and high-GNRI groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Unlike for NLR and CRP, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that low GNRI and visceral metastases were significant prognostic factors for short OS. CONCLUSIONS: First-line m-shGC showed a survival benefit for mUC, with GNRI a useful prognostic biomarker.

Urinary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 22 Cases.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the urinary tract is a rare disease. We present a relatively large retrospective cohort of urinary LCNEC, 20 from the urinary bladder, and 2 from the ureter, from a single institution. The patients included 16 men and 6 women with a median age of 74.5 years. Most LCNEC presented at an advanced stage with tumors invading the muscularis propria and beyond (21/22). Eight cases were pure LCNEC, while 14 cases were mixed with other histologic types, including conventional urothelial carcinoma (n=9), carcinoma in situ (n=7), small cell carcinoma (n=6), and urothelial carcinoma with glandular (n=3) features. Most LCNEC expressed neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin (22/22), chromogranin (13/16), CD56 (7/7), TTF1 (8/8), and INSM1 (2/3). They were negative for common urothelial markers including HMWCK (0/3), p40/p63 (0/6), CK20 (0/10), and had variable GATA3 staining (4/8). Ki-67 stained 25% to nearly 100% tumor cell nuclei. Patient survival was associated with cancer stage, and pure LCNEC showed worse survival than mixed LCNEC. Compared with small cell carcinoma at similar stages from a prior study, LCNEC had a worse prognosis only when patients developed metastatic disease. For organ-confined LCNEC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical resection is the treatment option to achieve long-term survival.

Nephron-sparing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is uncommon and presents unique challenges for diagnosis and management. Nephroureterectomy has been the preferred management option, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Nephron-sparing treatments are a valuable alternative and provide similar efficacy in select cases. A PubMed literature review was performed in English language publications using the following search terms: urothelial carcinoma, upper tract, nephron-sparing, intraluminal and systemic therapy. Contemporary papers published within the last 10 years were primarily included. Where encountered, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were given priority, as were randomized controlled trials for newer treatments. Core guidelines were referenced and citations reviewed for inclusion. A summary of epidemiological data, clinical diagnosis, staging, and treatments focusing on nephron-sparing approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are outlined. Nephron-sparing management strategies are viable options to consider in patients with favorable features of UTUC. Adjunctive therapies are being investigated but the data remains mixed. Protocol variability and dosage differences limit statistical interpretation. New mechanisms to improve treatment dwell times in the upper tracts are being designed with promising preliminary results. Studies investigating systemic therapies are ongoing but implications for nephron-sparing management are uncertain. Nephron-sparing management is an acceptable treatment modality best suited for favorable disease. More work is needed to determine if intraluminal and/or systemic therapies can further optimize treatment outcomes beyond resection alone.

Impact of high-intensity local treatment on overall survival in stage IV upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of high-intensity local treatment (LT) on overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the National Cancer Database, we identified 7,357 patients diagnosed with stage IV UTUC from 2004 to 2015. Patients who underwent high-intensity LT, defined as radical surgery of the primary tumor, were compared with those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Weighted survival analyses were used to test the association between high-intensity LT and OS. Multivariable Cox model was used to assess for independent predictors of OS. Sensitivity analysis was used to account for possible biases. RESULTS: Among stage IV patients, 10.6% (n = 779) had locally advanced disease (T4), 32.6% (n = 2,399) had node-positive disease (N+) and 56.8% (N = 4,179) had distant metastases (M+). Fewer than half of the patients underwent high-intensity LT (n = 2,908, 39.5%) while the remainder did not. On IPTW-adjusted survival analysis, high-intensity LT was associated with a prolonged OS (11.17 months [IQR, 5.19 to 24.28] months vs. 6.18 months [IQR, 2.27 to 14.49], P ≤ 0.001). A similar benefit was seen on adjusted survival analyses for each stage IV subgroup, defined according to TNM characteristics. The survival benefit was confirmed at sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: High-intensity LT in balanced cohorts of patients with stage IV UTUC is associated with prolonged OS including those with locally advanced (T4), node-positive (N+) or distant metastases (M+).

Rising incidence rates and unaltered survival rates for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a Dutch population-based study from 1993 to 2017.

AIM: To assess trends in the incidence, disease management and survival rates for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with primary UTUC in the Netherlands between 1993 and 2017 were identified through the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patient and tumour characteristics, as well as information on treatment and vital status, were retrieved from the NCR. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated, stratified by age, gender, calendar period and disease stage. Relative survival served as an approximation for cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: We identified 13 314 patients with primary UTUC. The age-standardized incidence rate increased from 2.0 in 1993 to 3.2 per 100 000 person-years in 2017, without change in gender distribution. The increase in incidence held for all disease stages except organ-confined (T1-T2) disease. The most prominent increase was in superficial (Tis/Ta) and metastatic (M+) UTUC, which increased from 0.6 to 1.2 and 0.1 to 0.4 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. The 5-year relative survival did not change over time: 57.0% (95% confidence interval 55.9-58.1). Applied treatments were largely the same over the study period, although fewer radical nephroureterectomies and more kidney-sparing surgeries were performed in the most recent years. The use of peri-operative intravesical chemotherapy modestly increased. CONCLUSION: Between 1993 and 2017, the age-standardized incidence of primary UTUC in the Netherlands has increased by more than 50%, but the relative survival of UTUC patients remained unchanged. Preventive measures against exposure to risk factors, early detection of disease, and more efficacious treatment methods are needed to improve outcomes of patients with UTUC.

Ureteral urothelial carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma differentiation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with multiple pathological types is extremely rare in the clinic, but the recurrence rate and mortality these patients are high. At present, there is no standard treatment for such cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of ureteral urothelial carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma differentiation and rapid ileal metastasis and reviewed the literature related to different pathological types of upper urinary tract tumours to explore the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis characteristics of the disease, enhance our understanding of its clinical manifestations and history of evolution and provide guidance for avoiding missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: There is no standard treatment for urinary malignant tumours with multiple pathological types; radical surgery is considered a suitable choice. Chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy may be beneficial to the survival of patients. In short, these patients have a high risk of recurrence and metastasis and a poor prognosis.

Trends in management of ureteral urothelial carcinoma and effects on survival: a hospital-based registry study.

BACKGROUND: High-risk ureteral tumors represent an understudied subset of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, whose surgical management can range from a radical nephroureterectomy (NU) to segmental ureterectomy (SU). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate contemporary trends in the management of high-risk ureteral tumors, the utilization of lymphadenectomy and peri-operative chemotherapy, and their impact on overall survival (OS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database from years 2006 to 2013 with clinically localized high-risk ureteral tumors treated with NU or SU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-squared tests were utilized to assess differences in clinicodemographic features and peri-operative treatment delivery between SU and NU cohorts. Cochran-Armitage tests and linear regressions were performed to evaluate temporal trends in treatment utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to assess predictors of treatment delivery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with OS. RESULTS: Of the 1,962 patients included, NU was more commonly performed than SU (72.4%, 1,421/1,962 vs. 27.6%, 541/1,962). Only 22.7% (446/1,962) of the population underwent lymphadenectomy, and 24.8% (271/1,092) of those with advanced pathology (≥pT2 or pN+) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Lymphadenectomy was associated with improved OS in NU patients when more than 3 nodes were removed (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.89). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced pathology had no impact OS in both the NU (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84-1.44) and SU (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.46) cohorts. Performance of SU was not associated with poorer OS on multivariable analysis (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.21, P = 0.83). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that SU may be an appropriate alternative to NU for the management of high-risk ureteral tumors. Further, lymphadenectomy may play an important role at the time of NU, and adjuvant chemotherapy is infrequently utilized in patients with advanced pathology.

Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) compared to upper tract urothelial carcioma (UTUC) treated with radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1299 patients with UCB and 276 with UTUC were obtained from multicentric collaborations. The association of disease location (UCB vs UTUC) with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as a post-treatment pathological stage ypT0N0) and pathological objective response (pOR, defined as ypT0-Ta-Tis-T1N0) after NAC was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. The association with overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A pCR was found in 250 (19.2%) patients with UCB and in 23 (8.3%) with UTUC (P < 0.01). A pOR was found in 523 (40.3%) patients with UCB and in 133 (48.2%) with UTUC (P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with UTUC were less likely to have a pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.70; P < 0.01) and more likely to have a pOR (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.89-2.08; P < 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.83; P < 0.01). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC remained associated with CSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82; P < 0.01), but not with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our present findings suggest that the benefit of NAC in UTUC is similar to that found in UCB. These data can be used as a benchmark to contextualise survival outcomes and plan future trial design with NAC in urothelial cancer.

Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for high-risk cN0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in patients with localised disease (≤cT2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients with high-risk cN0M0 UTUC who received NAC followed by surgery, compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery at Fujita Health University during 2005-2019. Baseline and tumour characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: There were 117 and 67 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively. Significantly higher pathological downstaging (pDS) and lower lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were observed in the study group than in the control group (48% vs 22%, P = 0.008 and 29% vs 46%, P = 0.045, respectively). The NAC group had significantly better 5-year OS (79% vs 53%, P = 0.003), 5-year CSS (84% vs 66%, P = 0.008), and 5-year RFS (80% vs 61%, P = 0.001) than the control group. The OS benefit of NAC was observed even in patients with localised (≤cT2) disease (P = 0.019). Patients with LVI showed significantly worse CSS both in pathologically locally advanced (≥pT3) and in localised (≤pT2) tumours (P = 0.048 and P = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified LVI, NAC, and pDS as independent predictors of OS. Male sex and post-NAC LVI were identified as predictors of worse survival in patients who underwent NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Two cycles of NAC improved the survival of patients with high-risk UTUC, even in patients with localised disease. Although two cycles of NAC appear to be effective in cN0M0 high-risk UTUC including localised disease, additional larger sample size multicentre prospective studies comparing short-course NAC regimens followed by surgery and surgery alone are required.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update.

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC. METHODS: We retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut-off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut-off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS. RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11-56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98-1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Pre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.

Complications Associated With Ureteroscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To compile and examine safety data from clinical studies of endoscopic management of patients with low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to identify rates and factors associated with reported complications. METHODS: Ovid Medline and Ovid Medline Daily (with Embase as secondary search) including citations from 1946-2018 were queried using the following terms: ureteroscopy, ureter, catheter, endoscopy, complication, adverse events, morbidity, ablation, laser, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, ureteral stricture, ureteral stenosis, and ureteral injury. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance; diagnostic studies, case studies, and reviews were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight publications (7 prospective, 31 retrospective) representing >1100 patients were identified. Ureteral stricture was the most frequently reported complication (studies; rates) (26/38; 0-27%), with incidence associated with number of procedures and treatment method. Bleeding, infection, and fever were most common with adjuvant treatment (BCG or mitomycin). Serious and fatal complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stricture is the most frequent complication of endoscopic UTUC management but can be managed successfully in most cases. Most complications were minor. Although additional prospective studies are needed, these results support the safety of ureteroscopic management of UTUC in appropriately selected patients.

Prognostic impact of non-urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: Analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the prognosis of patients with non-urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and compare it with that of patients with urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: We used hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract histologically confirmed non-urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma cases of the upper urinary tract diagnosed in 2008-2009. We estimated the 5-year overall survival by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 2567 upper urinary tract cancer patients with confirmed histological subtypes were identified. The most common histology of non-urothelial carcinoma was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 88, 3.4%) followed by adenocarcinoma (n = 33, 1.3%) and small cell carcinoma (n = 10, 0.4%). The proportion of advanced stage in the squamous cell carcinoma patients was significantly higher than that in the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003). In stage IV, the proportion of patients who received a combination of surgery + chemotherapy in the urothelial carcinoma group was higher than that in the non-urothelial carcinoma group (34% vs 16%, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rates of the non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stages I-III and stage IV were significantly worse than those of the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses, age ≥73 years, advanced stage (stage IV), tumor location (ureter) and the presence of non-urothelial carcinoma histology were independent poor prognosis factors. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of non-urothelial carcinoma patients is worse than that of urothelial carcinoma patients, especially for non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stage IV. More effective systemic therapies are required to improve these patients' oncological outcomes.